RESEARCH ARTICLE


A Comparative Study of Distribution Structure Cross Arms



Ramana Pidaparti1, Sriram Kalaga2, *
1 School of Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
2 Ulteig Engineers, Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota, USA


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 1756
Abstract HTML Views: 585
PDF Downloads: 844
ePub Downloads: 778
Total Views/Downloads: 3963
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 1024
Abstract HTML Views: 316
PDF Downloads: 286
ePub Downloads: 190
Total Views/Downloads: 1816



© 2017 Pidaparti and Kalaga.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Ulteig Engineers, Inc., 4285 North Lexington Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55126, USA, Tel: (651) 415 3873, Fax: (888) 858 3440; E-mail: sriram.kalaga@ulteig.com


Abstract

Background:

The structural performance of cross arms used on distribution poles is studied in this paper. Tangent and Dead End configurations involving conventional (wood) and composite (fiber glass) cross arms are analyzed. Strength-to-Stiffness and Weight-to-Stiffness ratios associated with study cases are determined and evaluated.

Results and Conclusion:

It is observed that although initial costs are higher, composite cross arms offer long-term advantages in terms of strength, stiffness, performance and durability.

Keywords: Composite, Cross arms, Dead ends, Distribution lines, Stiffness, Strength, Tangent, Wood.